IN LLOYDS BANK
LLOYDS 2019 AGM- MAY16th- EDINBURGH
Lloyds refused to reveal how many police forces are investigating their crimes and the moment Noel Edmonds mentioned the July 2014 letter from Lloyds lawyers Herbert Smith Freeholds to the CPS, which proves they’re guilty of perverting the course of justice, Lloyds cut the microphone and threw him out! See it here:
Lloyds Bank has been fined for supporting arms dealing,money laundering and tax evasion (source:BBC), rigging interest rates,cheating shareholders and abusing its own staff. Lloyds Bank is engaged in “systemic wrongdoing and criminality” (House of Commons debate Jan 2018) and blocking police investigations (Thames Valley police).Lloyds Bank senior executives are guilty of “perverting the course of justice” (Anthony Stansfeld-Police and Crime Commissioner) and have misled the Lloyds Board in contravention of the FCA’s- Senior Managers and Certification Regime- (Mr Jonathan Laidlaw QC).
Lloyds Bank consistently demonstrates a total disregard for the financial regulations and the rule of law. The mastermind behind the Lloyds policy of ‘lie and deny’ is the Portuguese CEO, Antonio Horta Osorio who has consistently lied to Parliament, the Police, the Serious Fraud Office, the National Crime Agency, the FCA, the media, the shareholders and the British public.
Antonio Horta Osorio must now feel the full weight of English law and be charged with organising the massive, decade-long, coverup of Lloyds criminal activities in London, Bristol and Edinburgh. Osorio must now be charged with “perverting the course of justice”.The prosecution to be conducted in a Crown Court in front of a jury. Maximum jail term-LIFE.
0:00 / 6:47
Jim Fitzpatrick MP’s speech on one of the many ‘Lloyds Bank Bristol BSU’ victims and the FCA reluctance to investigate despite mounting evidence.
At least the FCA-Farce, Cover-up, Arseholes are consistent-they whitewashed RBS’s GRG and now they’ve let their Lloyds chums off the hook.
BUT THE REAL CRIME CRUNCH IS COMING VERY SOON….Lloyds Bank are now the subject of more police investigations than any other UK company in history. The SFO, The NCA, Police Scotland and multiple English & Welsh police forces are crawling all over Lloyds senior management. WE PREDICT ARRESTS VERY SOON.”
Bank of Scotland fined £45m over failure to report fraud suspicions Financial watchdog hits lender with penalty over scandal at its Reading branch.
Lloyds Bank CEO Horty Nosorio always dodges questions from MP’s and in this case today he demonstrates his greed, lack of integrity and abject failure as a leader. 19 June 2019 Parliament Work and Pensions Committee
HORTY NOSORIO IS A BRAZEN LIAR AND CROOK
Time elapsed since HORTY NOSORIO publicly stated in 2017 that all victims of Lloyds’ criminality would be compensated-“fairly and swiftly”
Here are my immediate thoughts on the Crime Panel meeting in Weston Super Mare.
Will the Avon and Somerset Police Crime Panel demand an investigation in to Lloyds Bristol?
Highlights from last years BBC Inside Out report. Even though it only scratches the surface, it does point that something big has been going on at LLoyds Bristol..
Will A&S Police and Crime Panel listen to Lloyds Bristol victims?
The big Police and Crime meeting takes place on Tuesday Feb 5th. Will the Panel vote to force A&S police to listen to Lloyds victims and launch a full enquiry into their allegations of criminal activity in Lloyds Bristol HQ?
Lloyds Banksters are financial terrorists ruining livelihoods and destroying lives in order to satisfy their personal ambitions and spread their evil doctrine. Together we can defeat them.
Heartfelt gratitude for supporting me and my wife Liz.
Noel is now generating massive levels of interest in his battle with Lloyds bank and so here he explains to the curious how the Banksters destroyed his companies and why he will succeed in securing the return of his stolen goods.
Since we started asking questions we have heard from a number of people about wrongdoing by Lloyds in Bristol.
Bristol victims turn up the heat on Lloyds.
Bristol’s dark Lloyds Bank secret is about to be revealed and Bristol’s Mayor doesn’t care!
LLOYDS BANK have tried in the last few hours to buy NOEL EDMONDS’ silence.
LLOYDS CEO-ANTONIO HORTY NOSORIO- has attempted to silence NOEL EDMONDS with an astonishing bribe.
HORTY NOSORIO needs to silence EDMONDS’, whose team has compiled an explosive report into the criminality in LLOYDS BANK and clearly he’s getting desperate.
LLOYDS BANK, in the last few hours, have offered a multi-million pound bribe to NOEL EDMONDS in return for him signing a “Gagging Order” and they wish to also impose it on Noel’s wife Liz!
NOEL AND LIZ SAY- NO DEAL!
How the FCA respond to this APPG request for action will finally answer the question-“Is Andrew Bailey in cahoots with Antonio Horty Nosorio and protecting the corrupt CEO of LLOYDS BANK from potential criminal prosecution?”
Lloyds seem to think that they can distract people from their wrong doing with an advert full of heart-warming images of horses galloping on a beach. Unfortunately their use of the Dark Horse in their branding reminds us of their Dark Heart. If they told the truth their ad would be more like this!
Anthony Stansfeld is the Police and Crime Commissioner for Thames Valley Police and he is definitely a man on a mission. It is a great shame that other commissioners around the country are not following his example in pursuing banking criminality.
Why do I focus so much on bankers rather than the banks themselves? I have learned a lot about the UK banking industry during my battle with Lloyds and I have realised that the problems within the sector are down to the morals of some of the people that work in it.
How important is it to me that people understand exactly what is happening in my battle with Lloyds? Is my fight simply a case of someone with a high profile taking on a large bank or is it something bigger that should be of concern to everyone in the country?
At Prime Ministers Questions in the House of Commons on Dec 19th Kevin Holinrake MP raised the issue of the future of the Lloyd’s CEO Horty Nosorio and that of the current flawed compensation scheme. There are of course many people who think both should be replaced.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has been criticised for allowing Lloyds Banking Group to set up a “flawed” compensation scheme for victims of a massive fraud.
The SME Alliance, which represents small firms ruined in the fraud, has filed an official complaint with FCA.
It accuses Lloyds of covering up its awareness of criminality and excluding some victims from compensation.
In theory Britain’s regulations and the rule of law make sure that where injustices occur, justice is done and seen to be done. Do people still believe that? Not the Lloyd’s victims, according to Kevin Holinrake MP, speaking at the recent meeting of Parliament’s All-Party Group on Fair Business Banking.
Manchester United have decided they no longer require the services of “The Special One”. How much longer before Lloyds dispense with “The Not Sorry One”?
Patrick Hosking of The Times has written another excellent article considering he is constrained by a band of corporate lawyers who no doubt are terrified of legal action by certain corrupt individuals in our banking sector. However, we applaud Patrick’s attempts to shine a bright light into the cesspit of British Financial affairs and The Times determination to expose the FCA for what it has become- the F’ing C…..A…..we’ll leave you to fill in the rest.
It is too easy to swap sides between the regulator and the financial industry
A career move by a mid-ranking accountant wouldn’t normally attract much attention, but to a few, bruised small business people, there was something strangely familiar about the name of David de Souza, who joined Royal Bank of Scotland eight months ago as manager in its corporate governance and regulatory affairs department.
Mr de Souza previously had been the liaison man at the Financial Conduct Authority, overseeing the compensation scheme set up to enforce £2 billion of redress to up to 20,000 victims of the swaps mis-selling scandal. One of the biggest offenders was RBS and it was Mr de Souza who dealt with allegations of abuse levelled at that bank.
It’s the kind of gamekeeper-turned-poacher job switch, revealed last week by my colleague James Hurley, that raises hackles. The SME Alliance, a group representing some of the victims, described the move as “a spin too far of the revolving door . . . We are shocked that someone who has access to so much sensitive information passed to the FCA has been hired by the organisation that much of the material concerns.”
There is no suggestion of wrongdoing by Mr de Souza. Safeguards were put in place, the FCA says, and he was placed on three months’ gardening leave before joining the bank. RBS claims that his role involves “extremely limited” interaction with the FCA (though that doesn’t entirely square with his Linkedin page, in which he says his team’s primary role is to manage engagement with the FCA, Prudential Regulation Authority and the Bank of England).
Whatever the truth of the matter, it looks terrible that anyone playing honest broker in one of the most egregious mis-selling scandals of recent years, one that led to small firms failing, is three months later on the payroll of one of the perpetrators.
Mr de Souza is, of course, a relatively junior figure in the steady stream of FCA people moving to City jobs. His ultimate boss, Sir Howard Davies, the RBS chairman, was once chief executive of the Financial Services Authority, forerunner to the FCA. Sir Hector Sants, another FSA chief, moved to Barclays. Tracey McDermott, an acting FCA chief, went to Standard Chartered. John Tiner, head of the old FSA, is audit committee chief on the Credit Suisse board. Other notable defections include Margaret Cole, head of enforcement at the FCA, who is now chief risk officer at PWC; Clive Adamson, head of supervision at the FCA, who is now chairman of JP Morgan International Bank; and Christina Sinclair, acting head of retail at FCA, who went on to Barclays and now Commonwealth Bank.
There is a perfectly respectable case for regulators moving to banks. They can help to reinforce the cause of good compliance and treating customers fairly. As one former regulator told me: “You’ve drunk the Kool-Aid. You’re inculcated with the FCA way of doing things. You help promulgate that in the private sector. And you are listened to, too. It’s a good thing.”
The concern that ex-regulators know the weaknesses in FCA systems and are hired to help their new employers to find escape hatches and exploit loopholes is baloney, according to someone who has gone over fence. Even if you were so inclined — and most are not — get it wrong just once and your credibility would be shot to pieces forever. There’s also a strong case for movement in the other direction. Regulators need people who have worked in dealing rooms, IT departments, risk units and product-design divisions of financial services companies if they are to have a hope of understanding the complexity and culture of the entities they are supposed to be supervising.
Yet there are good reasons for caution. Justice needs to be seen to be done and the sight of regulators heading for the big bucks of private sector jobs can seriously undermine reputation. It’s not hard to imagine a senior regulator in their forties or fifties going a bit soft in the hope of landing a plum private sector role in the autumn of their career.
Some critics also see a danger that the FCA becomes a finishing school for ambitious lawyers and MBAs in their twenties wanting a job-smashing flourish on their CVs before entering the golden gates of a City career. Everyone in the gossipy world of regulation seems to know someone who cynically took an FCA job purely as a springboard or stepping stone. There is a brain drain from the FCA.
Perhaps the greatest danger of too much mingling, cross-pollination and fence-jumping is that people come to see moral equivalance to the two sides, with nothing to divide them except the interpretation of process. After the umpteen banking scandals of the past 15 years, that’s too generous a starting assumption. Regulators need to understand that they are in an adversarial position to the finance industry and that on occasions they will need to rebuke, punish and prosecute. A modicum of seemly distance is needed.
We learnt that lesson with the accounting profession. The independent review by Sir John Kingman has rightly recommended the abolition of the haplessly misgoverned Financial Reporting Council, until recently seen as little better than a retirement home for senior Big Four beancounters with very understanding natures. That was the revolving door in reverse.
Making it a bit harder for regulators to jump ship to the private sector would be no bad thing. Clauses could be written into FCA employment contracts giving it a veto on employees moving to employers they once supervised. Alternatively, the FCA could simply decline to authorise people moving into a senior bank role if it was seen to compromise its good standing.
At the very least, the FCA board needs to take a sober look at the problem and to consider tightening the rules. For a start, it’s surely perverse that it is the FCA rather than the poaching new employer that pays the cost of the gardening leave? We need more grit in the revolving door.
Patrick Hosking is Financial Editor of The Times
On Monday Dec 17th Today on BBC Radio 4 covered the complaint made to the Financial Conduct Authority by the SME Alliance which represents small business owners ruined by the HBOS fraud. The Alliance are strongly critical of the FCA for allowing Lloyds to set up a “Flawed compensation scheme”.
The pressure mounts on the UK’s most despised CEO, the corporate director controlling the UK’s most toxic company, LLOYDS BANK.
The Times has seen legal advice suggesting that the Lloyds compensation scheme is unlikely to provide just redress to the victims.
Lloyds’ compensation scheme ‘defective’
A compensation scheme set up by Lloyds Banking Group for small business owners ruined by a banking fraud has been labelled “defective”, based on a “flawed” methodology and “partial” to the bank’s interests.
A barrister’s opinion commissioned by representatives of some of the victims outlines alleged failings with the redress process established for business owners who suffered after a fraud at the Reading branch of HBOS.
Scores of small companies were damaged or destroyed when consultants linked with an HBOS “turnaround” unit asset-stripped their businesses and stole from the bank. Six men, including two former employees of the lender, were jailed for the £245 million scam last year. HBOS merged with Lloyds in September 2008.
Legal advice prepared by Jonathan Laidlaw, QC, and seen by The Times says that the compensation scheme is “unlikely to provide just redress” and that the level of compensation being paid out “gives rise to a real sense of injustice”.
Mr Laidlaw was commissioned by SME Alliance, a group which represents businesses damaged by banking scandals. The group has also made an official complaint to the Financial Conduct Authority which accuses António Horta-Osório, the Lloyds chief executive, of failing to immediately alert his board to a critical internal bank report.
The Project Lord Turnbull report alleges a conspiracy to “conceal the Reading incident” . Lloyds said that the report was provided to regulators and the police in 2014. However, it has been alleged that the board was not alerted until at least three years later.
It is understood that the FCA has received more than one complaint under the senior managers regime — legislation introduced after the financial crisis to ensure that executives are held directly responsible for their actions — alleging that Mr Horta-Osório failed in his corporate governance duties. A spokesman for the regulator declined to comment on the complaint but said that an investigation into the bank’s handling of HBOS Reading was “ongoing”.
Mr Laidlaw said that issues with the compensation scheme, which is independently overseen by Russel Griggs, a banking adviser, include victims not being properly consulted on its design; victims not being allowed to see the documents that decisions are based upon; and outcomes not being based upon detailed or sound reasoning. He wrote: “The Griggs review is flawed because it fails to adhere to well-established principles of natural justice.”
A parliamentary debate on the redress scheme is scheduled to take place tomorrow. The debate was secured by Kevin Hollinrake, co-chairman of the all-party parliamentary group on fair business banking.
Mr Hollinrake said that Lloyds had “sought to minimise payments to those who have suffered” and described the compensations scheme as a “sham” and a “national disgrace”. He said that Mr Horta-Osório “must be subject to a rigorous investigation under the senior managers regime for both the failures of the [compensation] process and the alleged cover-up”.
A spokeswoman for Lloyds said that the Griggs review was the “right approach” for delivering “fair and reasonable compensation for customers in a way which was quicker and less expensive than through a court process. We believe this objective has been fulfilled”.
Lloyds said that 71 customers in the review had received offers, 64 of which have been accepted, and that the compensation scheme was “reaching its conclusion”.
The bank has appointed Dame Linda Dobbs, a retired judge, to consider whether it properly investigated and reported the fraud after the HBOS acquisition. It said that this was the “appropriate forum for considering matters in relation to the Turnbull report”. Professor Griggs declined to comment.
What is the bankers’ default position when their crimes and wrong doings are discovered by the regulators, the police or the media?
Time and time again we have seen banks and bankers resort to the same nefarious strategies in a brazen attempt to avoid responsibility for their behaviour.
With the brand damage and controversy swirling around Lloyds at the moment are senior employees looking to escape before it gets any worse? It does seem likely that some of the rats may be ready to desert the sinking ship before the warrants start to arrive.
There are many other Lloyds victims and I believe that they will be helped by the mine of new information that I have uncovered whilst putting together the court action to win back my stolen property.
So, will I be producing an Edmonds Report ?
While we are in the jungle we are cut off from all forms of communication, so now I’m out I have been catching up on some of the coverage of I’m A Celebrity. You definitely can’t believe everything you read or hear on the news! You might also be surprised by the deep philosophical nature of some of conversations in the I’m A Celebrity camp.
Everyone knows that the most challenging part of I’m A Celebrity is the horrendous Bush Tucker Trials.
Usually I like the food on my plate to keep still while I’m eating it, so how did I manage to put those revolting creepy crawlies in my mouth?
That means I can now post some updates directly from Oz.
With the challenges of the jungle now behind me I’m now even more ready for the challenges ahead in the next decisive phase of my battle for justice with Lloyds Bank
Lloyds tried to totally discredit Sally Masterton, author of the so-called Turnbull report in to what Lloyd’s bosses knew about Criminality at HBOS before Lloyds bought it. They tried to bury the report saying they,” Didn’t recognise it”, but now, under pressure, they are changing their tune!
On November 22nd my lawyer Jonathan Coad of Keystone Law served Lloyd’s lawyers with legal papers to institute proceedings in my claim against the bank.
Why has it taken so long to get to this point and what do I think my chances are of winning ?
Does Noel really hate Ant and Dec?
Is he really involved in a spat with Holly Willoughby?
You probably won’t be too surprised to hear that the reality doesn’t bear much relation to the headlines, although Noel does have one amazing revelation the tabloids missed!
Noel says that his trip to the jungle is bound to help the profile of his ongoing battle with Lloyds to get justice for himself and other victims who lost their businesses because of the fraudulent actions of criminal bankers. If Lloyds were hoping his fight would run out of steam then they are very wrong!
A lot of people are wondering if it is Noel’s ongoing battle with Lloyds Bank that prompted him to say yes to taking part in I’M A CELEBRITY, after all he has encountered some fairly disgusting critters during that struggle! Could that be what made him want to take on the revolting bugs in the jungle?
Just before jetting off to Oz for I’M A CELEBRITY Noel gave us his thoughts on the chances of him coming out on top. If his battle with Lloyds is anything to go by we know he is more than ready for whatever the jungle has in store, but does he think he can win?
Despite supposed good news about the performance and profitability of Lloyds the share price keeps going down.
Something appears to be fundamentally wrong, even though the share price is constantly being talked up, the trend is in the other direction! So what do I think is going on with the Lloyds share price?
After months of trying to hack my way through the tangled thickets of Lloyds banking fraud I’m taking on a jungle challenge of a different kind and I’m really looking forward to it. So why is now the right time for me to be in I’M A CELEBRITY?
The media frenzy around the rumour NOEL EDMONDS will be the major star on this year’s I’m a Celebrity is quite unprecedented and almost all of the reports include details of his battle for justice with LLOYDS BANK.
Senior LLOYDS executives and in particular the odious HORTY NOSORIO must be quaking at the thought that EDMONDS whose name has become synonymous with the plight of all the victims of the U.K.’s most toxic bank, “might” be heavily featured every single night of the coming weeks on ITV.
Is it a coincidence that the LLOYDS share price has just crashed?
IS THIS THE CLEAREST SIGN YET OF THE INCREASING DIVISION WITHIN LLOYDS SENIOR MANAGEMENT?
Our sources have been reporting for many months that there is growing opposition within Lloyds senior management and the LLOYDS BOARD about the way in which the LLOYDS CEO HORTY NOSORIO and his sidekick, the Chairman LORD BLACKWELL, are blocking police enquiries and lying about their knowledge of the criminal culture within LLOYDS BANK.
Historically LLOYDS BANK have always denied ownership of the TURNBULL REPORT and lied through their teeth when they claimed that its author Sally Masterton had been acting independently and most certainly had not been instructed by LLOYDS executives to investigate the criminality and report back.
Under mounting pressure from every quarter- the media, politicians, the regulator, the police and of course thousands of LLOYDS’ victims those at the top of the U.K.’s most toxic bank have finally had to admit the truth and provide compensation to the woman they bullied to the very edge of a mental breakdown.
SALLY MASTERTON is by any definition an absolute heroine and she should be publicly acknowledged for her determination, in the face of appalling intimidation from LLOYDS, to place the truth in the public domain.
SO LLOYDS’ EXECUTIVES LIED:
1-THEY DID COMMISSION THE REPORT
2-THEY ALL KNEW ABOUT THE CRIMINAL ACTS IN THEIR BANK
BANKERS NEED TO BE TRUSTED.
WHO WOULD EVER TRUST LLOYDS BANK?
Its all here.
SALLY MASTERTON, the former LLOYDS BANK employee tasked with investigating the criminal activity within HBOS/LLOYDS compiled a report, as instructed by her managers, and when LLOYDS senior executives saw the incriminating evidence they began a massive cover-up.
LLOYDS also bullied Sally into silence and made her life, in her words, ‘ a living hell’.
Incredibly LLOYDS failed to break Sally and this extraordinarily brave lady decided to face up to the BANKSTERS and ensure that her report- code named TURNBULL- entered the public domain.
We now know the extent of the criminality within HBOS/LLOYDS which the senior management have been desperate to conceal for over a decade.
The current LLOYDS management under the morally corrupt CEO Antonio Horty Nosorio still maintain the lie that the criminality was confined to a couple of rogue bankers operating in a small regional office in Reading Berkshire. The TURNBULL REPORT blows this lie apart and confirms that the criminal activities extended throughout the HBOS/LLOYDS organisation and were most active in the region known as- London and the South-East, which of course includes LLOYDS’ London HQ.
Sally’s report was commissioned over six years ago which is why the EDMONDS REPORT it is so very important. This report compiled by the investigators and lawyers of NOEL EDMONDS’ legal team reveals more about the extent of the criminal behaviour, the modus operandi of the bankers and of particular significance the chain of command within HBOS/LLOYDS.
The EDMONDS REPORT explains in minute detail how LLOYDS targets its victims, controls their finances and then swiftly acquires their assets and livelihoods.
The evidence, backed up by witness statements, is compelling,irrefutable and utterly shocking.
After 12 months of investigations by lawyers and private investigators liaising with 3 police authorities; the APPG on Fair Business Banking; forensic accountants; investigative journalists and former HBOS/LLOYDS employees, NOEL EDMONDS’ legal team have completed a follow-up report to the explosive TURNBULL REPORT which blew apart the great LLOYDS BANK coverup.
This week copies of the the EDMONDS REPORT will be sent to LLOYDS’ lawyers and the National Crime Agency, Thames Valley Police, Police Scotland the SFO and the FCA.
JUSTICE FOR ALL HBOS/LLOYDS VICTIMS EDGES EVER CLOSER.
LLOYDS CAN NO LONGER HIDE THE TRUTH
MARK RITSON OF MARKETING WEEK WAS RIGHT ON 3 COUNTS:
1- NOEL EDMONDS HONEST MEDIA CAMPAIGN EXPOSING LLOYDS TOXIC CULTURE IS SERIOUSLY DAMAGING THE LLOYDS BRAND AND TURNING AWAY YOUNGER POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS.
2- NOEL EDMONDS NAME HAS BECOME SYNONYMOUS WITH LLOYDS CALLOUS HANDLING OF THEIR VICTIMS FIGHT FOR JUSTICE.
3- NOEL EDMONDS WILL NOT BE BULLIED INTO SUBMISSION.
AND JUST WHEN LLOYDS THOUGHT THINGS COULDN’T GET WORSE THERE’S A BIG SHOCK COMING…….
NOEL EDMONDS VERY HIGH PUBLIC PROFILE IS ABOUT TO BECOME EVEN HIGHER.
NOEL EDMONDS MEDIA COVERAGE IS ABOUT TO GO BALLISTIC.
MANY WILL BE EXCITED BY THIS INTERESTING DEVELOPMENT
LLOYDS’ CHAIRMAN LORD BLACKWELL WILL BE WIDE-EYED IN AMAZEMENT
THE LLOYDS BOARD WILL BE DUMB STRUCK
AND EVEN HORTY NOSORIO WILL BE SHOCKED TO THE CORE.
We all know that the “City” looks after its own to the exclusion of honest UK citizens and to the detriment of our once proud nation.
But, how much longer will the so-called financial “experts”, who influence the markets with their recommendations of buy or sell, conceal the dark truth which they all know about LLOYDS BANK?
In this Motley Fool article the analysis deliberately fails to alert readers to the subject which Lloyds executives are desperate to hide.
YES,WE AGREE. GIVE LLOYDS’ SHARES A VERY, VERY, VERY WIDE BERTH BECAUSE……
LLOYDS regularly schmoozes analysts and journalists in an effort to divert attention from the dark secret which, if given widespread coverage would almost certainly destroy the share price and possibly even trigger the failure of the entire Lloyds Banking Group.
What is the secret LLOYDS will do anything to hide?
LLOYDS BANK IS CURRENTLY FACING THOUSANDS OF LEGAL ACTIONS WHICH COLLECTIVELY AMOUNT TO NOT MILLIONS IN PAYOUTS-
THIS SCENARIO DWARFS THE £20 BILLION LLOYDS HAS SO FAR PAID OUT TO CUSTOMERS IT RIPPED OFF IN THE PROTECTION SCANDAL.
LLOYDS BANK IS FACING LEGAL CLAIMS BY VICTIMS WHICH ARE IN THE 100’S OF BILLIONS.
THATS WHY INVESTING IN LLOYDS BANK SHARES IS UTTER MADNESS.
BUT WHEN WILL A BRAVE CITY ANALYST HAVE THE GUTS TO TELL THE WORLD?
NOEL EDMONDS had to buy a LLOYDS’ share in order to attend the farce known as the LLOYDS AGM.
It cost him 67p.
That solitary share is now worth only 56p.
HORTY-along with the other LLOYDS shareholders EDMONDS is not happy with how you’re ruining their investments.
IT REALLY IS TIME FOR YOU TO GO.
We have a suggestion for your replacement……
He’s got the same business DNA as you HORTY.
The same moral fibre and ruthless disregard for truth and justice.
MOVE OVER HORTY NOSORIO-LET SIR PHIL RUN YOUR TOXIC BANK
DESPITE THE PR HYPE LLOYDS’ SHARES KEEP GOING DOWN!!!!!
WHERE WILL THE PRICE GO WHEN THAMES VALLEY POLICE, THE NATIONAL CRIME AGENCY AND THE SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE REVEAL THE RESULTS OF THEIR INVESTIGATIONS INTO LLOYDS EXECUTIVES?
GEORGE CULMER THE LLOYDS BANK FINANCE DIRECTOR HAS ANNOUNCED HE’S INTENDING TO LEAVE THE UK’S MOST TOXIC BANK.
AT THIS YEARS AGM NOEL EDMONDS ASKED GEORGE IF IT WAS TRUE THAT LLOYDS BANK SPEND EVERY YEAR £1.2 BILLION ON LAWYERS?
GEORGE PRODUCED JEERS OF CONTEMPT FROM SHAREHOLDERS WHEN HE RESPONDED- ‘thats not a figure I recognise’.
GEORGE- YOU MAY ESCAPE THE EXPOSURE OF LLOYDS CRIMINALITY BUT AS ONE OF THE ARCHITECTS OF THE FAILED COVER-UP YOU CANT AVOID PROSECUTION.SLEEP EASY.
KATHERINE MAY BE AN EXCELLENT, CONSCIENTIOUS JOURNALIST BUT SHE’S HORRIBLY DETACHED FROM THE REALITIES OF LIFE AS A VICTIM OF THE CORRUPT UK BANKING SYSTEM.
KATHERINE OBJECTS TO NOEL EDMONDS FIGHTING LLOYDS THROUGH BOTH THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND THE MEDIA.
OF MORE CONCERN IS THE FACT SHE CAN’T DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN BANKS AND BANKERS.
KATHERINE-the victims of the Banksters, which in terms of the austerity they triggered is pretty much every man, woman and child in the UK, are angry with BANKERS not BANKS. They want justice.
They want to see Bankers jailed. Until this happens the financial system will continue to be discredited and Bankers mistrusted. Past and present politicians are now calling for this to happen and just a few days ago the Chairman of the FCA expressed the view bankers should have been prosecuted.
In future please distinguish between the edifice and the evil humans within.
We receive a steady stream of cases just like Carl’s.
How can Horty Nosorio remain in his position when so clearly his bank has zero regard for its customers who it fleeces at every opportunity?
THIS MAN REALLY IS AN EVIL BASTARD